I am far too tired to write anything.

However....

I plan on entertaining a few ideas in the near future, such as...

(the relationship between) Social Networking Theory, Cronyism, and Corruption. The idea is that if personal relationship-based social institutions are somehow more powerful or natural or valid in the minds of social networking theorists than are democratic or law-based ones then we're getting close to advocating for a more corrupt society. If I work on this I get to read stuff from danah boyd, Phil Windley, and others.

The Virtues of Entrenchment. This could also be "the economics of entrenchment". The basic point is that entrenchment has been given a bad name over the years by management theorists, yet, much more than the theories that try to undermine it, entrenchment is the means by which corporations operate, careers are built, and success is measured. This idea is similar to the Social Networking Theory and Corruption idea, but perhaps defends an opposite moral thesis.

I dunno, it's spring, maybe I'll think of something else.